MiniMax: MiniMax M2.7 vs NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super
Side-by-side comparison — pricing, context window, capabilities, and live leaderboard data.
Key differences
- NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super has a 1000K-token context window — 4.9× larger than MiniMax: MiniMax M2.7's 205K.
- NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super is 68% cheaper per 1K input tokens than MiniMax: MiniMax M2.7 ($0.0001 vs $0.0003).
- MiniMax: MiniMax M2.7 is built by MiniMax; NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super is built by NVIDIA.
Specifications
| MiniMax: MiniMax M2.7 | NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | NVIDIA |
| Context window | 205K | 1000K |
| Max output tokens | 8192 | 8192 |
| Input price / 1K tokens | $0.0003 | $0.0001 |
| Output price / 1K tokens | $0.0012 | $0.0004 |
| Vision support | No | No |
| Function calling | No | No |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
About MiniMax: MiniMax M2.7
CN·ClosedMiniMax-M2.7 is a next-generation large language model designed for autonomous, real-world productivity and continuous improvement. Built to actively participate in its own evolution, M2.7 integrates advanced agentic capabilities through multi-agent...
View MiniMax: MiniMax M2.7 reliability and benchmark history →About NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super
US·ClosedNVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super is a 120B-parameter open hybrid MoE model, activating just 12B parameters for maximum compute efficiency and accuracy in complex multi-agent applications. Built on a hybrid Mamba-Transformer...
View NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super reliability and benchmark history →Try them yourself
Run the same prompt against MiniMax: MiniMax M2.7 and NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super side-by-side on PromptPit.
Start a comparison