Microsoft: Phi 4 vs NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super
Side-by-side comparison — pricing, context window, capabilities, and live leaderboard data.
Key differences
- NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super has a 1000K-token context window — 61.0× larger than Microsoft: Phi 4's 16K.
- Microsoft: Phi 4 is 28% cheaper per 1K input tokens than NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super ($0.0001 vs $0.0001).
- Microsoft: Phi 4 is built by Microsoft; NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super is built by NVIDIA.
Specifications
| Microsoft: Phi 4 | NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | NVIDIA |
| Context window | 16K | 1000K |
| Max output tokens | 8192 | 8192 |
| Input price / 1K tokens | $0.0001 | $0.0001 |
| Output price / 1K tokens | $0.0001 | $0.0004 |
| Vision support | No | No |
| Function calling | No | No |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
About Microsoft: Phi 4
US·Closed[Microsoft Research](/microsoft) Phi-4 is designed to perform well in complex reasoning tasks and can operate efficiently in situations with limited memory or where quick responses are needed. At 14 billion...
View Microsoft: Phi 4 reliability and benchmark history →About NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super
US·ClosedNVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super is a 120B-parameter open hybrid MoE model, activating just 12B parameters for maximum compute efficiency and accuracy in complex multi-agent applications. Built on a hybrid Mamba-Transformer...
View NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super reliability and benchmark history →Try them yourself
Run the same prompt against Microsoft: Phi 4 and NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super side-by-side on PromptPit.
Start a comparison