Microsoft: Phi 4 vs Mistral: Mistral Large 3 2512
Side-by-side comparison — pricing, context window, capabilities, and live leaderboard data.
Key differences
- Mistral: Mistral Large 3 2512 has a 262K-token context window — 16.0× larger than Microsoft: Phi 4's 16K.
- Microsoft: Phi 4 is 87% cheaper per 1K input tokens than Mistral: Mistral Large 3 2512 ($0.0001 vs $0.0005).
- Microsoft: Phi 4 is built by Microsoft; Mistral: Mistral Large 3 2512 is built by Mistral.
- Mistral: Mistral Large 3 2512 supports vision (image inputs); the other does not.
Specifications
| Microsoft: Phi 4 | Mistral: Mistral Large 3 2512 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Mistral |
| Context window | 16K | 262K |
| Max output tokens | 8192 | 8192 |
| Input price / 1K tokens | $0.0001 | $0.0005 |
| Output price / 1K tokens | $0.0001 | $0.0015 |
| Vision support | No | Yes |
| Function calling | No | No |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
About Microsoft: Phi 4
US·Closed[Microsoft Research](/microsoft) Phi-4 is designed to perform well in complex reasoning tasks and can operate efficiently in situations with limited memory or where quick responses are needed. At 14 billion...
View Microsoft: Phi 4 reliability and benchmark history →About Mistral: Mistral Large 3 2512
EU·ClosedMistral Large 3 2512 is Mistral’s most capable model to date, featuring a sparse mixture-of-experts architecture with 41B active parameters (675B total), and released under the Apache 2.0 license.
View Mistral: Mistral Large 3 2512 reliability and benchmark history →Try them yourself
Run the same prompt against Microsoft: Phi 4 and Mistral: Mistral Large 3 2512 side-by-side on PromptPit.
Start a comparison