Meta: Llama 4 Maverick vs NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super
Side-by-side comparison — pricing, context window, capabilities, and live leaderboard data.
Key differences
- NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super is 40% cheaper per 1K input tokens than Meta: Llama 4 Maverick ($0.0001 vs $0.0001).
- Meta: Llama 4 Maverick is built by Meta; NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super is built by NVIDIA.
- Meta: Llama 4 Maverick supports vision (image inputs); the other does not.
Specifications
| Meta: Llama 4 Maverick | NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | NVIDIA |
| Context window | 1049K | 1000K |
| Max output tokens | 8192 | 8192 |
| Input price / 1K tokens | $0.0001 | $0.0001 |
| Output price / 1K tokens | $0.0006 | $0.0004 |
| Vision support | Yes | No |
| Function calling | No | No |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
About Meta: Llama 4 Maverick
US·ClosedLlama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct (128E) is a high-capacity multimodal language model from Meta, built on a mixture-of-experts (MoE) architecture with 128 experts and 17 billion active parameters per forward...
View Meta: Llama 4 Maverick reliability and benchmark history →About NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super
US·ClosedNVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super is a 120B-parameter open hybrid MoE model, activating just 12B parameters for maximum compute efficiency and accuracy in complex multi-agent applications. Built on a hybrid Mamba-Transformer...
View NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super reliability and benchmark history →Try them yourself
Run the same prompt against Meta: Llama 4 Maverick and NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super side-by-side on PromptPit.
Start a comparison