Meta: Llama 4 Maverick vs Mistral: Mistral Large 3 2512
Side-by-side comparison — pricing, context window, capabilities, and live leaderboard data.
Key differences
- Meta: Llama 4 Maverick has a 1049K-token context window — 4.0× larger than Mistral: Mistral Large 3 2512's 262K.
- Meta: Llama 4 Maverick is 70% cheaper per 1K input tokens than Mistral: Mistral Large 3 2512 ($0.0001 vs $0.0005).
- Meta: Llama 4 Maverick is built by Meta; Mistral: Mistral Large 3 2512 is built by Mistral.
Specifications
| Meta: Llama 4 Maverick | Mistral: Mistral Large 3 2512 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Mistral |
| Context window | 1049K | 262K |
| Max output tokens | 8192 | 8192 |
| Input price / 1K tokens | $0.0001 | $0.0005 |
| Output price / 1K tokens | $0.0006 | $0.0015 |
| Vision support | Yes | Yes |
| Function calling | No | No |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
About Meta: Llama 4 Maverick
US·ClosedLlama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct (128E) is a high-capacity multimodal language model from Meta, built on a mixture-of-experts (MoE) architecture with 128 experts and 17 billion active parameters per forward...
View Meta: Llama 4 Maverick reliability and benchmark history →About Mistral: Mistral Large 3 2512
EU·ClosedMistral Large 3 2512 is Mistral’s most capable model to date, featuring a sparse mixture-of-experts architecture with 41B active parameters (675B total), and released under the Apache 2.0 license.
View Mistral: Mistral Large 3 2512 reliability and benchmark history →Try them yourself
Run the same prompt against Meta: Llama 4 Maverick and Mistral: Mistral Large 3 2512 side-by-side on PromptPit.
Start a comparison