Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Microsoft: Phi 4
Side-by-side comparison — pricing, context window, capabilities, and live leaderboard data.
Key differences
- Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has a 1049K-token context window — 64.0× larger than Microsoft: Phi 4's 16K.
- Microsoft: Phi 4 is 97% cheaper per 1K input tokens than Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview ($0.0001 vs $0.0020).
- Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is built by Google; Microsoft: Phi 4 is built by Microsoft.
- Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview supports vision (image inputs); the other does not.
Specifications
| Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Microsoft: Phi 4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | |
| Context window | 1049K | 16K |
| Max output tokens | 8192 | 8192 |
| Input price / 1K tokens | $0.0020 | $0.0001 |
| Output price / 1K tokens | $0.0120 | $0.0001 |
| Vision support | Yes | No |
| Function calling | No | No |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
About Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
US·ClosedGemini 3.1 Pro Preview is Google’s frontier reasoning model, delivering enhanced software engineering performance, improved agentic reliability, and more efficient token usage across complex workflows. Building on the multimodal foundation...
View Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview reliability and benchmark history →About Microsoft: Phi 4
US·Closed[Microsoft Research](/microsoft) Phi-4 is designed to perform well in complex reasoning tasks and can operate efficiently in situations with limited memory or where quick responses are needed. At 14 billion...
View Microsoft: Phi 4 reliability and benchmark history →Try them yourself
Run the same prompt against Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Microsoft: Phi 4 side-by-side on PromptPit.
Start a comparison