Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Meta: Llama 4 Maverick
Side-by-side comparison — pricing, context window, capabilities, and live leaderboard data.
Key differences
- Meta: Llama 4 Maverick is 93% cheaper per 1K input tokens than Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview ($0.0001 vs $0.0020).
- Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is built by Google; Meta: Llama 4 Maverick is built by Meta.
Specifications
| Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Meta: Llama 4 Maverick | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | |
| Context window | 1049K | 1049K |
| Max output tokens | 8192 | 8192 |
| Input price / 1K tokens | $0.0020 | $0.0001 |
| Output price / 1K tokens | $0.0120 | $0.0006 |
| Vision support | Yes | Yes |
| Function calling | No | No |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
About Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
US·ClosedGemini 3.1 Pro Preview is Google’s frontier reasoning model, delivering enhanced software engineering performance, improved agentic reliability, and more efficient token usage across complex workflows. Building on the multimodal foundation...
View Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview reliability and benchmark history →About Meta: Llama 4 Maverick
US·ClosedLlama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct (128E) is a high-capacity multimodal language model from Meta, built on a mixture-of-experts (MoE) architecture with 128 experts and 17 billion active parameters per forward...
View Meta: Llama 4 Maverick reliability and benchmark history →Try them yourself
Run the same prompt against Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Meta: Llama 4 Maverick side-by-side on PromptPit.
Start a comparison