Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6
Side-by-side comparison — pricing, context window, capabilities, and live leaderboard data.
Key differences
- Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has a 1049K-token context window — 4.0× larger than MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6's 262K.
- MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 is 64% cheaper per 1K input tokens than Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview ($0.0007 vs $0.0020).
- Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is built by Google; MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 is built by OpenRouter.
Specifications
| Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenRouter | |
| Context window | 1049K | 262K |
| Max output tokens | 8192 | 8192 |
| Input price / 1K tokens | $0.0020 | $0.0007 |
| Output price / 1K tokens | $0.0120 | $0.0035 |
| Vision support | Yes | Yes |
| Function calling | No | No |
| License | Proprietary | Open Weights |
About Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
US·ClosedGemini 3.1 Pro Preview is Google’s frontier reasoning model, delivering enhanced software engineering performance, improved agentic reliability, and more efficient token usage across complex workflows. Building on the multimodal foundation...
View Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview reliability and benchmark history →About MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6
CN·Open weightsKimi K2.6 is Moonshot AI's next-generation multimodal model, designed for long-horizon coding, coding-driven UI/UX generation, and multi-agent orchestration. It handles complex end-to-end coding tasks across Python, Rust, and Go, and...
View MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 reliability and benchmark history →Try them yourself
Run the same prompt against Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 side-by-side on PromptPit.
Start a comparison