Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 Plus
Side-by-side comparison — pricing, context window, capabilities, and live leaderboard data.
Key differences
- Qwen: Qwen3.6 Plus is 94% cheaper per 1K input tokens than Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 ($0.0003 vs $0.0050).
- Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 is built by Anthropic; Qwen: Qwen3.6 Plus is built by Qwen.
Specifications
| Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 | Qwen: Qwen3.6 Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Qwen |
| Context window | 1000K | 1000K |
| Max output tokens | 8192 | 8192 |
| Input price / 1K tokens | $0.0050 | $0.0003 |
| Output price / 1K tokens | $0.0250 | $0.0019 |
| Vision support | Yes | Yes |
| Function calling | No | No |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
About Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7
US·ClosedOpus 4.7 is the next generation of Anthropic's Opus family, built for long-running, asynchronous agents. Building on the coding and agentic strengths of Opus 4.6, it delivers stronger performance on...
View Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 reliability and benchmark history →About Qwen: Qwen3.6 Plus
CN·ClosedQwen 3.6 Plus builds on a hybrid architecture that combines efficient linear attention with sparse mixture-of-experts routing, enabling strong scalability and high-performance inference. Compared to the 3.5 series, it delivers...
View Qwen: Qwen3.6 Plus reliability and benchmark history →Try them yourself
Run the same prompt against Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 and Qwen: Qwen3.6 Plus side-by-side on PromptPit.
Start a comparison