Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 vs NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super
Side-by-side comparison — pricing, context window, capabilities, and live leaderboard data.
Key differences
- NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super is 98% cheaper per 1K input tokens than Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 ($0.0001 vs $0.0050).
- Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 is built by Anthropic; NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super is built by NVIDIA.
- Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 supports vision (image inputs); the other does not.
Specifications
| Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 | NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | NVIDIA |
| Context window | 1000K | 1000K |
| Max output tokens | 8192 | 8192 |
| Input price / 1K tokens | $0.0050 | $0.0001 |
| Output price / 1K tokens | $0.0250 | $0.0004 |
| Vision support | Yes | No |
| Function calling | No | No |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
About Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7
US·ClosedOpus 4.7 is the next generation of Anthropic's Opus family, built for long-running, asynchronous agents. Building on the coding and agentic strengths of Opus 4.6, it delivers stronger performance on...
View Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 reliability and benchmark history →About NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super
US·ClosedNVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super is a 120B-parameter open hybrid MoE model, activating just 12B parameters for maximum compute efficiency and accuracy in complex multi-agent applications. Built on a hybrid Mamba-Transformer...
View NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super reliability and benchmark history →Try them yourself
Run the same prompt against Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 and NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Super side-by-side on PromptPit.
Start a comparison