Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 vs MiniMax: MiniMax M2.7
Side-by-side comparison — pricing, context window, capabilities, and live leaderboard data.
Key differences
- Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 has a 1000K-token context window — 4.9× larger than MiniMax: MiniMax M2.7's 205K.
- MiniMax: MiniMax M2.7 is 94% cheaper per 1K input tokens than Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 ($0.0003 vs $0.0050).
- Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 is built by Anthropic; MiniMax: MiniMax M2.7 is built by MiniMax.
- Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 supports vision (image inputs); the other does not.
Specifications
| Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 | MiniMax: MiniMax M2.7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | MiniMax |
| Context window | 1000K | 205K |
| Max output tokens | 8192 | 8192 |
| Input price / 1K tokens | $0.0050 | $0.0003 |
| Output price / 1K tokens | $0.0250 | $0.0012 |
| Vision support | Yes | No |
| Function calling | No | No |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
About Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7
US·ClosedOpus 4.7 is the next generation of Anthropic's Opus family, built for long-running, asynchronous agents. Building on the coding and agentic strengths of Opus 4.6, it delivers stronger performance on...
View Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 reliability and benchmark history →About MiniMax: MiniMax M2.7
CN·ClosedMiniMax-M2.7 is a next-generation large language model designed for autonomous, real-world productivity and continuous improvement. Built to actively participate in its own evolution, M2.7 integrates advanced agentic capabilities through multi-agent...
View MiniMax: MiniMax M2.7 reliability and benchmark history →Try them yourself
Run the same prompt against Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 and MiniMax: MiniMax M2.7 side-by-side on PromptPit.
Start a comparison