Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 vs Microsoft: Phi 4
Side-by-side comparison — pricing, context window, capabilities, and live leaderboard data.
Key differences
- Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 has a 1000K-token context window — 61.0× larger than Microsoft: Phi 4's 16K.
- Microsoft: Phi 4 is 99% cheaper per 1K input tokens than Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 ($0.0001 vs $0.0050).
- Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 is built by Anthropic; Microsoft: Phi 4 is built by Microsoft.
- Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 supports vision (image inputs); the other does not.
Specifications
| Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 | Microsoft: Phi 4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Microsoft |
| Context window | 1000K | 16K |
| Max output tokens | 8192 | 8192 |
| Input price / 1K tokens | $0.0050 | $0.0001 |
| Output price / 1K tokens | $0.0250 | $0.0001 |
| Vision support | Yes | No |
| Function calling | No | No |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
About Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7
US·ClosedOpus 4.7 is the next generation of Anthropic's Opus family, built for long-running, asynchronous agents. Building on the coding and agentic strengths of Opus 4.6, it delivers stronger performance on...
View Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 reliability and benchmark history →About Microsoft: Phi 4
US·Closed[Microsoft Research](/microsoft) Phi-4 is designed to perform well in complex reasoning tasks and can operate efficiently in situations with limited memory or where quick responses are needed. At 14 billion...
View Microsoft: Phi 4 reliability and benchmark history →Try them yourself
Run the same prompt against Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 and Microsoft: Phi 4 side-by-side on PromptPit.
Start a comparison