Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 vs Meta: Llama 4 Maverick
Side-by-side comparison — pricing, context window, capabilities, and live leaderboard data.
Key differences
- Meta: Llama 4 Maverick is 97% cheaper per 1K input tokens than Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 ($0.0001 vs $0.0050).
- Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 is built by Anthropic; Meta: Llama 4 Maverick is built by Meta.
Specifications
| Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 | Meta: Llama 4 Maverick | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Meta |
| Context window | 1000K | 1049K |
| Max output tokens | 8192 | 8192 |
| Input price / 1K tokens | $0.0050 | $0.0001 |
| Output price / 1K tokens | $0.0250 | $0.0006 |
| Vision support | Yes | Yes |
| Function calling | No | No |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
About Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7
US·ClosedOpus 4.7 is the next generation of Anthropic's Opus family, built for long-running, asynchronous agents. Building on the coding and agentic strengths of Opus 4.6, it delivers stronger performance on...
View Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 reliability and benchmark history →About Meta: Llama 4 Maverick
US·ClosedLlama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct (128E) is a high-capacity multimodal language model from Meta, built on a mixture-of-experts (MoE) architecture with 128 experts and 17 billion active parameters per forward...
View Meta: Llama 4 Maverick reliability and benchmark history →Try them yourself
Run the same prompt against Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 and Meta: Llama 4 Maverick side-by-side on PromptPit.
Start a comparison