Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6
Side-by-side comparison — pricing, context window, capabilities, and live leaderboard data.
Key differences
- Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 has a 1000K-token context window — 3.8× larger than MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6's 262K.
- MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 is 85% cheaper per 1K input tokens than Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 ($0.0007 vs $0.0050).
- Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 is built by Anthropic; MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 is built by OpenRouter.
Specifications
| Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 | MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | OpenRouter |
| Context window | 1000K | 262K |
| Max output tokens | 8192 | 8192 |
| Input price / 1K tokens | $0.0050 | $0.0007 |
| Output price / 1K tokens | $0.0250 | $0.0035 |
| Vision support | Yes | Yes |
| Function calling | No | No |
| License | Proprietary | Open Weights |
About Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7
US·ClosedOpus 4.7 is the next generation of Anthropic's Opus family, built for long-running, asynchronous agents. Building on the coding and agentic strengths of Opus 4.6, it delivers stronger performance on...
View Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 reliability and benchmark history →About MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6
CN·Open weightsKimi K2.6 is Moonshot AI's next-generation multimodal model, designed for long-horizon coding, coding-driven UI/UX generation, and multi-agent orchestration. It handles complex end-to-end coding tasks across Python, Rust, and Go, and...
View MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 reliability and benchmark history →Try them yourself
Run the same prompt against Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 and MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 side-by-side on PromptPit.
Start a comparison