Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale

Side-by-side comparison — pricing, context window, capabilities, and live leaderboard data.

Key differences

  • Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 has a 1000K-token context window — 6.1× larger than DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale's 164K.
  • DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale is 94% cheaper per 1K input tokens than Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 ($0.0003 vs $0.0050).
  • Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 is built by Anthropic; DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale is built by DeepSeek.
  • Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 supports vision (image inputs); the other does not.

Specifications

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
ProviderAnthropicDeepSeek
Context window1000K164K
Max output tokens81928192
Input price / 1K tokens$0.0050$0.0003
Output price / 1K tokens$0.0250$0.0004
Vision supportYesNo
Function callingNoNo
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source

About Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7

US·Closed

Opus 4.7 is the next generation of Anthropic's Opus family, built for long-running, asynchronous agents. Building on the coding and agentic strengths of Opus 4.6, it delivers stronger performance on...

View Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 reliability and benchmark history →

About DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale

CN·Open

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is a high-compute variant of DeepSeek-V3.2 optimized for maximum reasoning and agentic performance. It builds on DeepSeek Sparse Attention (DSA) for efficient long-context processing, then scales post-training reinforcement learning...

View DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale reliability and benchmark history →

Try them yourself

Run the same prompt against Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 and DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale side-by-side on PromptPit.

Start a comparison

Or browse the full AI model leaderboard.