AI21: Jamba Large 1.7 vs Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7
Side-by-side comparison — pricing, context window, capabilities, and live leaderboard data.
Key differences
- Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 has a 1000K-token context window — 3.9× larger than AI21: Jamba Large 1.7's 256K.
- AI21: Jamba Large 1.7 is 60% cheaper per 1K input tokens than Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 ($0.0020 vs $0.0050).
- AI21: Jamba Large 1.7 is built by AI21; Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 is built by Anthropic.
- Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 supports vision (image inputs); the other does not.
Specifications
| AI21: Jamba Large 1.7 | Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | AI21 | Anthropic |
| Context window | 256K | 1000K |
| Max output tokens | 8192 | 8192 |
| Input price / 1K tokens | $0.0020 | $0.0050 |
| Output price / 1K tokens | $0.0080 | $0.0250 |
| Vision support | No | Yes |
| Function calling | No | No |
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
About AI21: Jamba Large 1.7
Other·ClosedJamba Large 1.7 is the latest model in the Jamba open family, offering improvements in grounding, instruction-following, and overall efficiency. Built on a hybrid SSM-Transformer architecture with a 256K context...
View AI21: Jamba Large 1.7 reliability and benchmark history →About Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7
US·ClosedOpus 4.7 is the next generation of Anthropic's Opus family, built for long-running, asynchronous agents. Building on the coding and agentic strengths of Opus 4.6, it delivers stronger performance on...
View Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 reliability and benchmark history →Try them yourself
Run the same prompt against AI21: Jamba Large 1.7 and Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 side-by-side on PromptPit.
Start a comparison